Empire Avenue is a drug, I may need a 12-step program!

{EAV_BLOG_VER:50ed0224d82d85dd}

This is the verification code the good people at Empire Avenue have asked me to place at the start of a blog post in order to verify that this really is a blog, and it’s mine. Smacks of paranoia to me, but I suppose there can be a lot riding on making sure ethics and morality are being observed in the heady game of betting on people.

Empire Avenue, Social Media GamingI won’t go into the game’s concept, you can read about that on (where else?) Wikipedia. But I will say that once I started reading some of the guidance offered by a few of the pioneers (the one-year anniversary of being public is coming up in July), I realized I had fallen into the classic trap of buying up stock in people I knew. It didn’t take long before my stock price flattened and my earnings were preceded by two and then three zeros. Wake up!

I took some time to read the extensive post by Chris Pirillo much of which has yet to sink in, two and three readings hence, but one thing rang like a bell: ratios. Look for dividends of 1.0 or better. Cripes! I was invested in a whole bunch of 0.25′ers. The search for finding those mystical 1.5, 1.86, even (dare I say it?) 2.0 dividend generators sucked up a good half a day, but I found them when yet another reading of Chris’ wisdom taught me to look at the Leaders board and sort for Weekly Dividends.

I could go on, but this is not about business use of social media. Or is it? I noticed that the Leader board had two columns, people and companies. While some appear to be virtual companies, many are names you know: Intel, Xbox, Google, Laughing Squid and Mashable, to name a few. So what is in it for these businesses you ask?

What is social media but more tools to carry on better conversations with customers, prospects, potential employees and influencers, right? Stock price performance on Empire Avenue is heavily influenced by activity on social platforms, as well as interactions with shareholders and investors on Empire Avenue. Companies that want to drive up their price in “eaves” (the EA virtual currency if you didn’t read the Wikipedia explanation yet) have to do what they should be doing anyway, and they attract new supporters (aka EA shareholders) as they do it. Win–Win or what?

More on this as my knowledge develops. For now, I suggest you get in, set up a profile, and start investing heavily in SRDILL, a sure winner!

FacebookLinkedInEmailDeliciousDiggStumbleUponRedditShare
Posted in Industry | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Friend, Connection, Both?

I have been asked often enough this question that it warrants a public answer. Many people are concerned about what the protocol is for who to friend on Facebook, as opposed to connect with on LinkedIn, often constructing elaborate rationales for who gets included in one but not the other. He is the advice I give my clients:

If you are clairvoyant you need to tell me right now and we are going to Vegas on the next jet out of town.

LinkedIn Is a wonderful networking tool

If not, don’t think for a moment that your reasoning will be the same as anyone else’s. The viral nature of social media dictates—in my opinion—that you offer to make every possible connection you can. If someone else doesn’t accept, that is their issue. If someone gets confused, there will be 13,471 who are not. Here is the only truth you can count on in social media: the bigger the network, the more people who will find out what you are up to. Now recognize that my clients are business people, they better want people to know what they are up to. If you are a hermit or prefer to live off the grid, you can stop reading here.
For some reason the memo about Facebook being a mature business tool has not gotten out to everyone, so there are some who try to tell me “that’s for my personal life and LinkedIn is for my professional life.” Google is the wonder blender that doesn’t give a penny where it finds the information, it’s going to dish it when someone looks for you or any topic associated with you.
The good news is there are very few things you can do:
  1. Put a profile up everywhere and make sure it represents you well.
  2. Connect/Link/Friend everyone you have ever met, or ever will meet, on at least Facebook and LinkedIn. EVERY one of them!
  3. Make sure you build a page on Facebook for every business you own, every passion you pursue, and every organization/team/club you form.
  4. Build a page on LinkedIn for every company you own, form a group around each of those companies, as well as every passion you pursue, and every organization/team/club you form.
  5. Pump a steady stream of content into each of those pages and groups, answer every question, thank everyone who comments, and be nice and follow everyone else’s pages, no matter if they are a fan of yours.
And all the rest will take care of itself.

 
Now that’s just my opinion, you may beg to differ. I base this opinion on my rule of “Energy Conservation.” It takes energy to keep track of life’s details, right? Who you have introduced to whom, what you said to this person or that, etc. I realized long ago that I have more energy than most, but that I still didn’t want to waste energy keeping track of stories told, decisions I would not remember the logic of two days later, or anything else that I could leave to technology, perfect recall or instinct. (The greatest boost to my daily energy was the Palm Pilot! I have been hooked on PDAs and Smartphones ever since.)

Facebook will be the world's Yellow AND White PagesSo following my rule of energy conservation, I run a totally transparent life. There are no secrets, I freely share my pictures, thoughts, ideas and friends. My Facebook profile is an adjunct of my LinkedIn profile, as the two are each a side of the same coin. I post to five blogs and tweet about them all to make sure someone finds something of value in the easiest way possible.

And that, my friends and clients, is the only recommendation I can make, because I just cannot fathom keeping track of who I gave access to my photos, but not my wall.

FacebookLinkedInEmailDeliciousDiggStumbleUponRedditShare
Posted in Industry, Marketing, Services | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

What IS Social CRM and Why is it Following Me?

For just a moment, let’s distill marketing down to two simple elements: customers and companies. Today there are (still!) marketers who see the conversation between those two elements as a one-way broadcast from companies to customers. A large percentage of marketers (please let it be the majority!) see it as a two-way conversation, with customers (all the various flavors of them: prospects, clients, influencers, shareholders, employees, etc.) doing most of the talking. Companies are realizing how much they can learn when they listen instead of speak.

Keeping that conversation going used to be the responsibility of the sales rep. For many products and services, that is an inefficient use of limited resources, if not a logistic impossibility. Customer Relationship Management software, CRM, was developed from the card file that most good sales reps used to keep on each of their clients or accounts. In an automated version of the Mackay 66, CRM, or contact management software, as it was first known, was able to prompt and capture everything that a company should know to create and maintain strong relationships with their customers. The scope of CRM has come along way since the days of ACT for individual and small company installs, and early versions of Siebel and Oracle for large corporate applications.

The weak point was that darn human who had to check for what wasn’t filled out yet and ask for the information and then enter the information into the CRM so that some progress was being made, and it was being credited to them. Sales reps were conscious of which of their actions paid the bills, and data entry could never seem to be considered motivating, much less rewarding.

Enter social media, unveiling an astounding propensity for people to—overtly or covertly—inform the world of their interests and needs on their own by commenting, reviewing, clicking, buying, searching, emailing and doing just about anything else on the Web. As Brian Solis accurately summarized it for the Wall Street Journal, “Customers Inspire The Socialization of CRM.”  In Brian’s article, a review of an in-depth study by the Altimeter Group titled, “Social CRM: The New Rules of Relationship Management,” he addresses the evolution of Social CRM succinctly: “…the evolution from CRM to sCRM is in fact, revolutionary.”  From the Altimeter Group report:

Customers continue to adopt social technologies at a blinding speed – yet organizations are unable to keep up. Why? Rapid adoption of social networking enables users to connect with individuals and communities who share mutual interests, increasingly leaving organizations out of the conversation. Simply hiring more people to keep up with social marketing, sales, and support will not be sufficient, as consumers and their new channels will always outnumber employees. As a result, companies need an organized approach using enterprise software that connects business units to the social web – giving them the opportunity to respond in near-real time, and in a coordinated fashion.

Other analysts and bloggers have presented case studies illustrating the transition and integration scenarios companies are faced with as they choose to adapt their existing systems or start anew. One set of case studies was gathered by Lauren Carlson for The Software Advice Blog. Her article points out one key development in the evolution of CRM from something that could just as well have been called Sales Automation: the responsibility has been decentralized from just sales, now including everyone from the top down. Lauren’s report is helpful when the case studies are seen in the aggregate. These tales of social media tools used to increase communication among employees to know the status of deal flow and product development, measurement tools drawing attention to customer issues before they escalate, customer support communities eliminating the need for email support and lowering demand for phone support, and collaboration platforms supporting real-time discussions among users, partners, and programmers to accelerate the pace of development and target customer’s priorities.

These are indications of progress. Social CRM is evidence that technology is responding to and accommodating the needs of the users, rather than the other way around. And the fact that the users are largely clients is even better. We’ve always had sales data. We usually always knew how to contact our customers, even if for mass market brands that meant broadcast and billboards. But we used to pay dearly to understand their preferences, fix their problems, or anticipate their next desires. And even those who ponied the cash didn’t get a real clear picture from the small samples they could afford. No matter what we did we could never seem to bridge the gap between customers and companies.

As Brian Solis says in summary, “This is about earning a prestigious position in the hearts, minds, and ultimately, decisions of customers, prospects and those who affect their actions, today and tomorrow. Essentially, with the socialization of media and the redistribution of authority and influence, we are competing for the future simply by listening, responding, learning and adapting.”

While we’re not yet in bed with our customers, we are getting farther into their heads than ever before.

FacebookLinkedInEmailDeliciousDiggStumbleUponRedditShare
Posted in Industry, Marketing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

The Power of Performance

A mutual friend turned me on to a video presentation by Frederick Townes, CTO of Mashable and founder of W3 Edge, given at Wordcamp in Denmark in May of this year. The message can be summed in one phrase: WordPress is nice, it’s easy, but if your livelihood depends on it, you better get to know how to configure it or your site’s performance will be average to poor.

This is 104 minutes long. Fred’s presentation is complete in 40 minutes, but the Q&A afterward is worth the watch. And the slides offer very, very valuable links to measurement sites, plugins, and code samples. Be sure to download those!

Fred has learned a lot in the 13 years I have known him, much of it driven by a desire to know how to optimize the Web experience. He is well worth following on Twitter and LinkedIn.

FacebookLinkedInEmailDeliciousDiggStumbleUponRedditShare
Posted in Industry, Services | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

How Valuable is Design on the Web?

The answer to that question is, “Just as important as it is for toasters and MP3 players.” Design is the unspoken language of art. Without a sound it can attract or repel. And while most see it as highly subjective—and in fine art it most assuredly is—in “logic products” (hardware, tools, even software interfaces) successful design can approach universal appreciation. Think iPod. The first MP3 player I had was the most amazing bundle of frustrating confusion I have ever seen. I was only continuing to subject myself to the torture of remembering how to get the desired result because it was given to me by my kids. They were watching to see how much I was enjoying it. When it became obvious ‘enjoyment’ was not a word I could use to describe my daily interaction with this device they bought me an iPod. Within seconds I felt empowered. Instantly I was able to explore its capabilities and go back to them easily. The interface of the click wheel and simple menus gave me great joy. I never touched the other MP3 player again. Such is the power of great design.

I dug up an article I wrote in 2004 that I still find valid and I share it with you now:

Let’s examine how important Web Design is to the success of any Web-based marketing campaign. In a September 2003 report from Forrester Research titled  “The Best and Worst of Site Design, 2003″ the authors stated, “Most of the problems we found were self-inflicted wounds resulting from site managers who naively allow designers to: hide value, turn interfaces into dexterity tests, favor “white space” over information, and leave users hanging.” The traps are subtle, but good design is a triumph over more than the pitfalls. Good design is the result of a process of deep thought. And therein lies the biggest benefit of good design: visitors to the site who are thinkers know that the designer is a thinker. They know that the designer was not acting out of ego, but of thinking of the needs of others.

Sites that exhibit good design—those that anticipate the needs of their visitors, prospects and patrons—are directly rewarded with ROI: return on investment. Using scenarios and personas to truly step inside the visitor’s likely situation(s) give designers clear priorities in the numerous decisions around navigation, use of imagery, arrangement of content, linkages within the site, and required functionality. Without clear objectives and a firm grasp of the audience, misuse of the opportunity to communicate value to each and every visitor is the likely outcome. Using technology to dazzle does little to convey meaning, much less compel thinking customers to stay. For those who use the Web as art, technology prowess is fine. For those who are intent on conducting commerce and generating qualified leads, the name of the game is conscientious, concise, controlled experience of the features and benefits of the products or services the site owner offers.

There is more to achieving a site’s objectives than good design, but at the first view of a Web site is the visitor’s impression of the whole site formed. If it’s not positive, the rest of the site and its intent is fighting an uphill battle. Thinking becomes the most important step in any site design. Who are the visitors? What are they looking for? What is their situation, are they rushed? Are they knowledgeable? Are they looking for opinions or facts? Are they the kind of prospect the site owner is looking for? Knowing the answers to those and more questions will better inform a designer than any images, cool Flash techniques, or PHP application.

Let’s talk design success. What are your experiences in creating good design? How do you identify bad design?

FacebookLinkedInEmailDeliciousDiggStumbleUponRedditShare
Posted in Industry, Marketing | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Can Social Media Scale?

Interesting presentation by Jeremiah Owyang on his Web strategy blog discusses the concerns that many large corporations have: can we scale social media as the demand grows? As Jeremiah says, “the amount of discussion generated from customers is only going to increase while your internal social strategists and community managers may only marginally increase.”

Jeremiah suggests that corporations put in place a strategy that pursues, most likely in parallel, three crucial initiatives:

  • Using all the voices in your ecosystem (the Rings of Influence) not just being the only ones to talk.
  • Develop more customer-to-customer technologies that leverage your customers to do your marketing, sales, and support.
  • Invest in Social CRM systems, while immature now, they will eventually help companies respond in real time –and maybe even anticipate customer need.

I recommend reading Jeremiah’s slide deck where you will find many suggestions and examples of what companies are doing now. I was reminded of how many “old school” technologies contribute to the socialsphere, such as forums and knowledgebases. But the future of social CRM is a key variable in how well companies will cope and for a more complete analysis of that, I suggest Jeremiah’s report on 18 Use Cases of Social CRM. The strategy of how social CRM fits with your sales and marketing CRM strategy is going to take some time and discussion, bringing in a moderator such as Jeremiah and his company, Altimeter, is something to consider and budget for.

I can hear some of my network saying, “But I have 20 employees, we have hundreds of customers, we are already fighting a losing battle!” Two responses: 1) it’s not going to get any less important, and 2) Jeremiah’s recommendations still apply. The job description of “Community Manager” is not new for your company, it used to be called customer service. There is a change in scale, however. Where your customer service rep may have only responded to random phone calls and emailed inquiries, the social network landscape opens up many opportunities to be proactive, and to hear when you customer is talking about you, rather than to you. As the leader of a company of any size the truth is that understanding and using social media at virtually all levels in your company is crucial for your success. As Chris Brogan talks about in his post on Scaling Social Media, social media is “… part of the relationship-building, … and can’t be skimped on.”

What is your view of the growth of social media relative to your company’s growth? Are you losing the race? What are you doing to increase the multiplier of social media involvement and effectiveness per employee?

FacebookLinkedInEmailDeliciousDiggStumbleUponRedditShare
Posted in Industry | Tagged , , , , , | 4 Comments

What is “The Siteless Web” and how do you use it?

The exploding demand to monitor your presence on the Web

The exploding demand to monitor your presence on the Web

Steve Rubel writes in this post that the AP and other news (and other content) syndicators have found in Facebook a way to build identity for a service that has always been secondary to the publisher. I see a slightly different twist on AP’s investment in Facebook. For many the light is dawning: there is a gradual movement toward a Web presence that is not based on “one site,” but rather distributed content across many aggregators – sites that cater to specific audiences. Let the other sites do what it takes to create communities, then offer your goods and services there. As long as the platform supports all a customer needs to know or do, why do you need a site of your own? Search will instead direct prospects to your content, even to the perfect community to access that product or service if their search string is very specific. In a post on this topic by Paul Gillen, @pgillen, he says as much. “A person’s or brand’s online presence will increasingly be syndicated through a network of feeds that may find their home almost anywhere.” I commented that:

I am absolutely seeing the lack of importance in any one site if it’s pure “thought content” we are talking about. Seems obvious that The Siteless Web would not apply when it’s commerce or private/secure interaction (such as managing client account data) we are talking about, right? Small quantities of any product could be sold in a variety of sites, I suppose, but for any catalog of product, or an array of services for that matter, the “company site” will still be necessary, will it not? And will it not be search still that leads us to the hooks people and brands place in the many pools when we don’t know who to ask for a referral, or we want to compare options or offerings? On the one hand, this supports the rampant, even indiscriminate, distribution of “thought leadership” content across the Web. (Investment tip: server and storage companies will never see a declining market demand. Ever.) On the other, it raises the staffing demand in order to:

  • Keep ahead of the list of new sites that attract appropriate audiences, and
  • Tailor the content to each community so as to be perceived as sensitive to the interests and needs of each audience, and
  • Monitor comments and feedback through each placement in all sites.

And what of metrics and measurement? Is it overly simplistic to see the industry reverting to the classic, monotheistic measurement of success: sales? Why would you rely on traffic tracking to continue publishing to a site if it only takes one reader to call and order to justify the time and talent invested in the posting to the site where they saw your post? The folks at Gomez and Hubspot aren’t going to like hearing that, but I wonder if the siteless Web frees marketers from having to be left-brained technologists and returns them to the creative side? Not that such a scenario is all roses for the aforementioned never-ending list of new social networks, bookmarking, photo, video, opinion sites and blogs. That volume is actually terrifying to visualize.

What this means to companies is a choice—should they staff this need themselves or turn to outside resources to create, monitor, even to engage in dialog with their audiences on the many platforms and in the many threads of conversation where they add relevance and have an opportunity to build trust?

SRD InterActive stands ready to assist no matter how that issue is decided. From the strategy development, to the resource identification, to the full production and ongoing support. Call or email to start that discussion.

FacebookLinkedInEmailDeliciousDiggStumbleUponRedditShare
Posted in Industry, Marketing | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Twitter: Blinded by the Obvious

The Internet itself had the same reaction: “this too shall pass” everyone said. But the Internet remains, and continues to grow in importance, as strange as that seems, every single day. Now Twitter is getting ‘the treatment’, people in marketing, sales and virtually every walk of life are telling anyone who will listen that Twitter is a waste of time. They know this to be true.

I commented on a MediaPost research report on the demographic survey that the Pew Internet & American Life Project recently released, largely because people who should have known better took the opportunity to discount any value in Twitter. Their use of words such as “hype,” “worthless” and “bias” called me into action. Here is my take on Twitter, or at least the slice of it that I posted as a comment:

I find that comments about how Twitter is used by the masses ignores how Twitter is used by the professionals. Social Media is a faster, and some might argue more powerful, SEO tool than traditional SEO. The technology of Twitter is what is important, not the content found in any random sampling of the Twitter stream. Links are indexed by search engines almost immediately and they last forever and they get very fast response. Good content attracts large traffic numbers if posted to Twitter by a dependable source who has built a significant following.

Don’t be fooled by looking only at the surface. Twitter search, now lists, and some of the associated tools such as foursquare are changing the way money is made on the Web, customers are served, dialogs with prospects are initiated, and audiences are assembled. Twitter has powerful Google juice and it is up to the wise to tap into it.

I had a similar response to a friend, Mike Schneider, when he was curious about how few college juniors were using Twitter:

I just taught a similar class last week at the NE School of Photography. Similar results of the poll. Different reason why, though. These are photographers trying to get work in a world where there are more cameras than there are people. I tell people Twitter is pure Google Juice. Say it on Twitter with a good number of followers and read about it on Google within hours. Talk about your blog post or someone else’s on Twitter and watch the visitor stats go through the roof. I tell them that it is one of the few nets that will be tossed into more pools than they can find on their own, meaning that what they say can, and most likely will be if it’s crafted correctly, spread out to others’ lists of followers without any effort on their part. Some day the shelf life of Twitter content will probably be measured in centuries.

Social media is about leveraging technology to get found. I’ve taught that class to groups of older sole practitioners, college students, ad agencies, and professionals sharpening their self-promotion skills and darn close to 100% of them do not see it for that.

Twitter is SEO for everyman. As with all change, you have a choice as to how long you want to stay where you are and deny yourself the advantage of that change. I put it off for a while, but I am grateful to Aaron Strout for waking me up to the power of social media in general, and Twitter in specific .

If you want to start driving traffic to your efforts, get into Twitter and start reading the many tutorials on how to leverage it. If you need help, contact me.

Add Me

FacebookLinkedInEmailDeliciousDiggStumbleUponRedditShare
Posted in Industry, Marketing | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Content As Conversation Is Valuable

While checking the Twitter stream of a friend, Robert Collins, I was directed to a post by Matthew T. Grant titled “Content Is Still King (It’s Just Not What You Think It Is)” and found it an interesting contrast to my posting below, “Good Content Pays.” Where I saw my view as targeting somewhat “static” marketing websites and Matthew’s as looking at blogs and measuring success in the content’s ability to attract comments and instigate conversations, as I read more I realized the value of any content being able to inspire dialog. That got me thinking, why shouldn’t product descriptions accept the comments of the audience of prospects, clients and analysts who may be evaluating the information being offered? Who couldn’t see the value of suggestions and questions around the description of a service offering?

Recognizing that we are in an inbound world, are website owners building in a way to promote and then capture the results of this crowdsourcing opportunity? (Take 3:20 to watch this nice explanation by Jeff Howe on Crowdsourcing.) Judging by the vast majority of the company websites I have seen, I feel confident in saying no. The exception to that rule are those now being built on a blog platform and taking advantage of the conversation tools, widgets and plugins available. This is the environment where Matthew’s comment, ”content is not a product, it’s a process” hits home. In the world of content as process, where “…marketing content is less about what your organization says and more about what your people do,” any of the following could become viable—and valuable—content:

  • Meeting minutes
  • Product testing memos
  • Staffing assignment announcements
  • Phone calls
  • Reaction to analyst commentary
  • Bug reports
  • Feature wish lists
  • Company retreat schedule

“Back in the day” senior executives I was consulting to reeled back when I tried to show them how to use a word processor. “Are you trying to make into a secretary?” they would shout. Those of my past clients still alive and at work probably haven’t had a secretary in the last 15 years. Technology has for the past 20 years been showing us how to do more with what we already do. Today, that technology allows companies to build trust on nothing more than transparency, sharing the thoughts and activities of the company through its staff.

I strongly suggest you read what Matthew has to say and evaluate who is a content developer in your firm, and what can be done with the valuable content they are producing every day.

Add Me

FacebookLinkedInEmailDeliciousDiggStumbleUponRedditShare
Posted in Marketing | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Good Content Pays!

Traffic to a site can be a blessing or a curse. Visitors who find what they are looking for, are engaged in what the site offers, and/or come away with a positive impression become the site owner’s best allies and customers. But lead a visitor to believe that they will find what they are looking for and then not provide on your promise and you will find yourself being stabbed in the back repeatedly by people you will never know. As discussed in another article, “What Are the Benefits of Good Design on the Web?” the task of the site owner is not simply to ask all the right questions and make sure the designer interprets the answers correctly. Just as challenging is the need for the correct content—content that is largely dictated by the answers to the same questions so important to good design: Who are the visitors? What are they looking for? What is their situation, are they rushed? Are they knowledgeable? Are they looking for opinions or facts? Are they the kind of prospect the site owner is looking for?

Much is made of the importance of “fresh” content, but I posit that the right content is ageless if it’s still relevant to the audience it’s targeted toward and the business objectives continue to be met. A constant infusion of ill-aimed content on top of bad or incorrect content is no answer to the challenge of gaining and keeping customers. So the question is, “What’s the right content?” As Michael Gerber states in his must-read book, E-Myth Revisited, “It is in the understanding of value, as it impacts every person with whom your business comes into contact, that every extraordinary business lives.” Deep knowledge of your customers will define your entire business and make clear the boundaries of your content.

Content development is often a missed opportunity for creativity. Here a team can and should gather to read and digest what the psychographics profiles indicate the interests and motivators of the audiences are. As a hedge against myopia, your team should include one or more from outside your company or immediate colleagues. The same scenarios that influence the designers should be the frameworks for role-playing within the content team.

No matter the intent of the site – whether e-commerce, private intranet, public promotion, nonprofit research, or secure account management – the measurement of success, the determinant of how much the site is returning on the owner’s investment, is found in the server logs. They tell the story of the visitor’s travels through the site. If the content is good, visitors will linger when they find content that resonates with who they are and their situation. If they stay less than a minute, going to another site from the first page they land on, you are looking at either a visitor who realized they were not looking for what you were offering, or a visitor who was turned off by the content they perused in those first 30 seconds. Good content engages; good content pays!

Add Me

FacebookLinkedInEmailDeliciousDiggStumbleUponRedditShare
Posted in Marketing | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment